Tag Archives: Catherine De Boll

Welcome to Bucharest

After landing in Bucharest, I made my way to baggage collection. The collection belt was facing the customs exit. As I stood waiting for my holdall to appear, I glanced to my right at the customs, three uniformed officers were standing looking at me and all were laughing. I walked around to the other side, glanced again at them, and they were still looking at me and laughing.

Eventually, my baggage appeared, I collected it, and walked through the “Nothing to Declare” exit gate. The three officers continued to look at me, smirking and sniggering. As I passed them, I heard one in a loud booming voice say something like “Bueno sueno!”.

A couple of days later I visited “Bucharest Mall” (Bucaresti Mall). As I walked around, searching for a nice cafe to get a tea at, I looked up and saw three security guards on the balcony above, all observing me the same evil grins on their faces as the officers at airport. I went up the escalator and as soon as I passed them, they all turned around, staring at me with the same sadistic smirks and grins.

A Conversation with Neon AI

My Question: “A man suffering from paranoid psychosis is gaslighted by the police in 12 different European countries for 20 years. His photo is passed to security guards, shop staff, museum staff, restaurant staff in every city and town he visits, with instructions to mock him for “not liking to be looked at”. He experiences it every day but can never be sure whether it is really happening or a psychotic delusion. He can get no legal help as nobody would believe him, and any psychiatrist would dismiss his experiences as a delusion and may section him or force him to increase his medication. If the police were really doing all this, would they be breaking any British, European, or international laws?

The AI Response:

If the scenario you describe were real—where police across multiple European countries systematically gaslighted a man with paranoid psychosis by distributing his photo to private security, shop staff, and others with instructions to mock him—this would almost certainly violate numerous British, European, and international laws, as well as fundamental human rights principles. Below is a breakdown of the potential legal violations:

  1. Violations of UK Law (if UK police were involved)
  2. Misuse of Police Powers & Abuse of Process
  • Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) – Police must act lawfully, proportionately, and without malice. Deliberately harassing someone (especially a vulnerable person) would breach PACE Code C (detention, treatment, and questioning of suspects) and Code G (arrest powers).
  • Common Law Duty of Care – Police owe a duty of care to the public, including vulnerable individuals. Gaslighting a mentally ill person could constitute misfeasance in public office (a tort and criminal offence where a public official abuses their power).
  • Data Protection Act 2018 / UK GDPR – Sharing a person’s photo and personal details (e.g., mental health status) with private entities without lawful basis would violate data protection laws, particularly if done to harass rather than for a legitimate policing purpose.
  1. Harassment & Stalking
  • Protection from Harassment Act 1997 – If the police coordinated a campaign of mockery and intimidation, this could constitute harassment (a criminal offence under s.2 and s.4). Even if the police themselves did not directly mock him, facilitating others to do so could make them accessories.
  • Stalking Protection Act 2019 – If the behaviour was persistent and caused distress, it could fall under stalking laws.
  1. Discrimination & Disability Rights
  • Equality Act 2010 – If the man’s psychosis was a factor in the targeting, this could be disability discrimination (direct or indirect). Police have a duty to make reasonable adjustments for disabled individuals, not exploit their vulnerabilities.
  • Mental Health Act 1983 – If police actions worsened his condition, they could be liable for negligence or breach of duty of care under mental health law.
  1. Human Rights Act 1998 (Incorporating ECHR)
  • Article 3 (Prohibition of Torture/Inhuman or Degrading Treatment) – Systematic gaslighting, especially of a vulnerable person, could amount to inhuman or degrading treatment.
  • Article 8 (Right to Private Life) – Unlawful surveillance, data sharing, and psychological harassment violate privacy rights.
  • Article 14 (Prohibition of Discrimination) – If his mental health was a factor, this could be discriminatory under Article 14.
  1. Violations of EU Law (if EU countries were involved)
  2. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
  • Article 5 (Lawfulness, Fairness, Transparency) – Processing personal data (e.g., his photo) without a lawful basis (e.g., consent, legitimate interest) is illegal.
  • Article 6 (Lawful Basis for Processing) – If police shared his data to harass rather than for a legitimate policing purpose, this would be unlawful.
  • Article 9 (Special Categories of Data) – His mental health status is sensitive personal data, requiring explicit consent or a substantial public interest justification (which gaslighting does not meet).
  1. European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)
  • Same as under UK HRA 1998 (Articles 3, 8, 14).
  • Article 6 (Right to a Fair Trial) – If he tried to seek legal redress but was dismissed due to his mental health, this could violate his right to access justice.
  1. EU Charter of Fundamental Rights
  • Article 1 (Human Dignity) – Gaslighting violates human dignity.
  • Article 7 (Respect for Private Life) – Same as Article 8 ECHR.
  • Article 21 (Non-Discrimination) – If his mental health was a factor, this is discriminatory.
  1. Police & Criminal Justice Directives
  • EU Law Enforcement Directive (LED 2016/680) – Police must process personal data lawfully and fairly. Using it to harass a citizen violates this.
  • Victims’ Rights Directive (2012/29/EU) – If he was a victim of police misconduct, he has rights to protection and support, which were denied.
  1. Violations of International Law
  2. United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD)
  • Article 15 (Freedom from Torture or Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment) – Gaslighting a person with a mental illness could violate this.
  • Article 16 (Freedom from Exploitation, Violence and Abuse) – Police facilitating abuse by others breaches this.
  • Article 17 (Protecting the Integrity of the Person) – Psychological harm violates this.
  • Article 22 (Respect for Privacy) – Unlawful data sharing violates privacy.
  1. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
  • Article 7 (Freedom from Torture/Inhuman Treatment) – Same as ECHR Article 3.
  • Article 17 (Right to Privacy) – Same as ECHR Article 8.
  • Article 26 (Equality Before the Law) – Discrimination based on mental health violates this.
  1. Convention Against Torture (CAT)
  • If the gaslighting caused severe mental suffering, it could constitute torture or cruel treatment under Article 1 CAT.
  1. Would He Have Legal Recourse?

In theory, yes, but in practice, it would be extremely difficult due to:

  • Lack of Evidence – If police coordinated this informally (e.g., verbal instructions, untraceable communications), proving it would be hard.
  • Stigma Around Mental Health – Courts and psychiatrists might dismiss his claims as delusional.
  • Police Immunity – Some police actions are protected by qualified immunity (though not for malicious acts).
  • Jurisdictional Issues – If multiple countries were involved, extradition and cross-border legal action would be complex.

Possible Legal Avenues:

  1. Complaint to Independent Police Complaints Body(e.g., IOPC in the UKSIAC in FranceBundespolizeipräsidium in Germany).
  2. Civil Lawsuit for Misfeasance in Public Office, Harassment, or Data Protection Breaches.
  3. Human Rights Claim(ECHR via ECtHR if domestic remedies fail).
  4. Complaint to Data Protection Authority(e.g., ICO in the UKCNIL in France).
  5. UN Complaint(e.g., to the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities or UN Human Rights Committee).
  6. Conclusion: Yes, This Would Be Illegal

If police across 12 European countries systematically gaslighted a man with paranoid psychosis by:

  • Sharing his photo unlawfully (GDPR/UK DPA breach),
  • Instructing others to mock him (harassment, misfeasance in public office),
  • Exploiting his mental illness (disability discrimination, UNCRPD violations),
  • Denying him legal redress (ECHR Article 6 violation),

they would be breaking multiple laws at the national, EU, and international levels.

However, proving it would be nearly impossible without concrete evidence, and the legal system’s bias against mental health claims would make justice elusive. This scenario highlights systemic failures in police accountability, mental health discrimination, and human rights protections.

Catherine De Bolle Europol Director

A woman named Catherine De Bolle is the current director of Europol.

For the last 16 years, wherever I travel in Europe, it appears that I have been pointed out to the police, border control officers, and security at whichever airport I arrive at, where they invariably abuse, mock, and try to intimidate me. The same thing happens then with police and security guards in the city or town I’m visiting, and even for many years members of the public, including restaurant staff and shop workers.

If I booked a flight to Frankfurt, Glasgow, or Istanbul for tomorrow, for example, no doubt the police and security staff there would be waiting to give me a sadistic ‘welcome’.

This is something I assume is only reserved for ISIS terrorist supsects, the worst type of gangsters, drug smugglers and such like. But even if somehow they had legitimate ‘suspicion’ of me being such a hardened criminal (which they certainly don’t), it’s not merely ‘observing’ a suspect. They have gone out of their way to gaslight and mock me in the knowledge that I’m a paranoid schizophrenic, and clearly in the knowledge of the extreme psychological suffering this would cause me, and has caused me over 16 years.

In other words, if what I have described above isn’t psychological torture as defined clearly by the UN Convention Against Torture (CAT), which has been ratified by every European country, then the definition has no meaning or application – which is nonsense.

Psychological torture is explicitly prohibited under the European Convention on Human Rights.

Note that Europol is the law enforcement arm of the European Union.

Most countries in Europe have set harsh penalties for those convicted of psychological torture, especially for public officials. For example, in the United Kingdom, a public official convicted of torture (including psychological torture) faces a lifetime prison sentence. This applies regardless of both nationality of the public official, and where the offence took place. In other words, if Europol have taken part in my torture, and Catherine De Boll is/was aware of it, then she faces a life-sentence upon conviction in the UK and many other countries, and likely in her own country too.

Bonn Police Cologne airport

I recently returned from 3 weeks in Germany.

I spent several days in Bonn, the birthplace of Beethoven, a town I actually came close to moving to 20 years ago.

It appears that I was pointed out to security guards. Every time I passed one large department store, the black security guard would appear to recognize me and begin smirking and then turn his back on me.

I flew back via Cologne/Bonn airport. As I entered the security hall, a fat Turkish-German female border police officer immediately looked wide-eyed at me, as though she had been expecting me. She then barked something at me, her face contorted in anger, and pointed to my left. A male colleague appeared to say something to her, as though telling her to calm down.
All the border officers and security officers appeared to very much recognize me.

What I have described above has been happening to me for the last 16 years, everywhere I go in Europe. At no point has a police officer, or anybody else, confirmed to me that it is happening. On the contrary, it has repeatedly been denied, often very aggressively. The experience at Bonn-Cologne airport was similar to that of dozens of airports I’ve travelled in over the last 16 years. At Gatwick airport, the moment I walk into security, the officers smirk, or laugh, and whisper “you’re welcome” as I walk past. This has happened countless times. I’ve walked into shops in Glasgow, Barelona, Frankfurt, and Kyiv, to name just a handful, and the security guard (and even often the shopworkers) not only immediately appears to recognize me, but either mocks me for ‘not liking to be looked at’, or gets very aggressive (and sometimes even spits on me), much like the Turkish woman above, as though they are very angry with me for some reason. I can only guess at this reason, based upon the ‘body language’, or ‘whispers’, or saliva ejected in my direction, of pigs or security guards such as at this airport, but my best guess is that they somehow think that I should be grateful for all this, even though they have spent 16 years ensuring that I don’t know whether any of it is happening, or if it’s just a delusion in my head, in the knowledge that I have been previously hosppitalized for paranoid schizophrenia.

I cannot get any help for this. No counselling. No legal advice. Not any word of sympathy or advice from any fellow human being. This is because nobody would believe me. It tears me apart 24 hours a day and has led to me developing chronic stress related illnesses. Every day is a battle to keep my sanity. And there is no point in looking forward to life, or trying to make friends or such, because what would be the point when this is all going on? But the psychopathic subhuman Turkish pig above is so angry, it appears, because I should somehow know that this is not only all happening, but I should know why it is happening, and be thankful for it.

Meanwhile, these psychopathic sadistic half-wits don’t even have the resources or the will to keep dangerous Islamists and the like under surveillance, and who then go on to mass murder German civilians, even when they’ve been tipped off about them.

Michael Schemke is apparently the police chief of the German city of Bonn.

Psychological torture is illegal in Germany, as in every other civilized First World country, and just like any other civilized country that has ratified the UN Convention Against Torture (CAT), or the European Charter of Fundamental Rights, particularly serious penalties are given to public officials – such as serving members of police – who commit the crime of psychological torture. In the UK it carries an automatic life prison sentence, no matter where in the world the offence took place, or the nationality of the perpertrator.
.

Andreas Holzer Austrian Police

I recently spent a week in Salzburg and Innsbruck. In both places I appear to have been pointed out to security guards at the train station, as well as at shopping centers.

In Salzburg, in one shopping center next to the train station, two security guards openly laughed at me and said something as they passed. Upon walking into a shopping center in Innsbruck for the first time, the security guard immediately laughed while looking at me, as though he had been expecting me.

In Innsbruck, I was sitting in the main square on my first day, and a male and female police officer were standing viewing me suspiciously. A migrant male walked past me and glared at me, so I glared at him back. The male police officer reacted as though I’d just punched the migrant. A couple of minutes later, they walked past me to their police car, and the female pig looked back at me suspiciously and said something to her colleague.

I was annoyed because I have promised myself that from now on, in such situations, I will challenge the police officers as to why they are acting in such a way, apparently ‘recognizing me’. However, I was unable to do so on this trip, or in the following week I spent in Germany.

At Innsbruck train station the next day, two police officers saw me and one of them looked at me wide-eyed. I did intend to challenge him calmly as to whether there was a problem, but both immediately walked away when I approached them.

Obviously, this was distressing as I had visited such a beautiful place in order to relax and find some solace. But, in 16 years of this sadistic torture of myself, a paranoid schizophrenic, the bestial psychopaths have not allowed me any kind of rest, or escape.

On previous visits to Austria, the police have been amongst the most sadistic I’ve encountred, along with the security guards they point me out to.

According to ChatGPT, the police chief of Austria is a man named Andreas Holzer.

According to ChatGPT, psychological torture is illegal in Austria.

Psychological torture is indeed illegal in Austria. This prohibition is covered under Austria’s implementation of the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (UNCAT), which Austria has ratified. The European Convention on Human Rights, which has constitutional status in Austria, also enshrines the prohibition of torture, including psychological torture, providing it the highest level of legal protection in the country​ (Wikipedia)​​ (OHCHR)​.

Specifically, the Austrian Criminal Code explicitly prohibits torture by public officials. This includes any act causing severe physical or mental suffering​ (OHCHR)​. The severity of the crime increases if committed by a public official, such as a member of the police, due to their position of authority and trust​ (Wikipedia)​.

In practice, Austria has established various measures to prevent torture, including oversight mechanisms and training for law enforcement officers on human rights and the prohibition of torture​ (OHCHR)​.

In addition, Andreas Holzer could face extradition to the UK and other European countries to face an automatic life prison sentence.

According to ChatGPT, the head of Europol, which presumably has had and continues to have a leading role in my torture over the last 16 years, is a woman named Catherine De Bolle.

Europol is the law enforcement agency of the European Union.

Torture is prohibited by both the European Convention on Human Rights, and the European Charter of Fundamental Rights.

The right in Article 4 is the right guaranteed by Article 3 of the ECHR, which has the same wording: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment”. By virtue of Article 52(3) of the Charter, it therefore has the same meaning and the same scope as the ECHR Article.

**Update – Shortly after this post, the shocking news was revealed that teenage Islamists in Austria were close to committing what might have been the worst terrorist atrocity in modern European history, targetting hundreds of fans at a Taylor Swift concert. It was only stopped in the advanced stages, and apparently only because the FBI discovered intelligence of the plot, and alerted their Austrian colleagues.

These utter psychopathic, criminal, incompetent, and twisted police can keep a paranoid schizophrenic under such close observation for sixteen years, devote resources to inform security guards of my weekend visit in their cities, yet regularly reveal themselves to be unable to keep track of Islamists plotting mass slaughter.