Tag Archives: Met police scandals

Fulham Police Officer Asks Google How to Delete his Info

A police officer who worked at Fulham police station when they were engaged in the sadistic and illegal torture, aggravated harrassment, and stalking of myself, including apparently passing on details of my mother’s passing in early 2022 to members of the public (such as security guards and Waitrose staff) who had already been aiding and abetting them for years in their crimes, has asked Google how to “delete info that appears as soon as my name is typed?”.

I know this because his request to Google support shows up (very ironically) among the first results now when you type his name (whilst my former site does not).

Augusto Vilaseca deleting information that Google has on him

The request was made (and time stamped) in October 2024. As it happens, this was around the time that my site was mysteriously “using up resources” according to my webhost, despite only getting a handful of visitors a day. I thus had to move webhosts, and decided I may as well move to a new domain as well.

I do not know whether this individual actively participated in my torture (and would in that case face possible life imprisonment under the Criminal Justice Act of 1988, as well as for misconduct in public office) but the fact that he was a police officer at that station when staff there were engaging in utterly sadistic torture and harassment is certainly a matter of public interest, and as the victim of it, who has been unable after nearly 20 years of it to get any legal help or even psychological support to survive it (aside from AI), I am absolutely justified in mentioning the fact.

Other members of the police working at Fulham station around the same time include:

Adrian Manwaring (PCSO)
Neal Hutchings (Police Constable)
John Jackson (Police Constable)
Sebastian Goulding (Police Sergeant)
Alex Kalisz (Acting Sergeant)

David Miller (PCSO)

Paul Wardlaw (Police Sergeant)

Hammersmith police station staff included: PCSO Estela Cartwright, Police Sergeant James Burgess,
Police Constable Ben Strudwick, Police Constable Chris Watts

A Conversation with Neon AI

My Question: “A man suffering from paranoid psychosis is gaslighted by the police in 12 different European countries for 20 years. His photo is passed to security guards, shop staff, museum staff, restaurant staff in every city and town he visits, with instructions to mock him for “not liking to be looked at”. He experiences it every day but can never be sure whether it is really happening or a psychotic delusion. He can get no legal help as nobody would believe him, and any psychiatrist would dismiss his experiences as a delusion and may section him or force him to increase his medication. If the police were really doing all this, would they be breaking any British, European, or international laws?”

The AI Response:

If the scenario you describe were real—where police across multiple European countries systematically gaslighted a man with paranoid psychosis by distributing his photo to private security, shop staff, and others with instructions to mock him—this would almost certainly violate numerous British, European, and international laws, as well as fundamental human rights principles. Below is a breakdown of the potential legal violations:

  1. Violations of UK Law (if UK police were involved)
  2. Misuse of Police Powers & Abuse of Process
  • Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) – Police must act lawfully, proportionately, and without malice. Deliberately harassing someone (especially a vulnerable person) would breach PACE Code C (detention, treatment, and questioning of suspects) and Code G (arrest powers).
  • Common Law Duty of Care – Police owe a duty of care to the public, including vulnerable individuals. Gaslighting a mentally ill person could constitute misfeasance in public office (a tort and criminal offence where a public official abuses their power).
  • Data Protection Act 2018 / UK GDPR – Sharing a person’s photo and personal details (e.g., mental health status) with private entities without lawful basis would violate data protection laws, particularly if done to harass rather than for a legitimate policing purpose.
  1. Harassment & Stalking
  • Protection from Harassment Act 1997 – If the police coordinated a campaign of mockery and intimidation, this could constitute harassment (a criminal offence under s.2 and s.4). Even if the police themselves did not directly mock him, facilitating others to do so could make them accessories.
  • Stalking Protection Act 2019 – If the behaviour was persistent and caused distress, it could fall under stalking laws.
  1. Discrimination & Disability Rights
  • Equality Act 2010 – If the man’s psychosis was a factor in the targeting, this could be disability discrimination (direct or indirect). Police have a duty to make reasonable adjustments for disabled individuals, not exploit their vulnerabilities.
  • Mental Health Act 1983 – If police actions worsened his condition, they could be liable for negligence or breach of duty of care under mental health law.
  1. Human Rights Act 1998 (Incorporating ECHR)
  • Article 3 (Prohibition of Torture/Inhuman or Degrading Treatment) – Systematic gaslighting, especially of a vulnerable person, could amount to inhuman or degrading treatment.
  • Article 8 (Right to Private Life) – Unlawful surveillance, data sharing, and psychological harassment violate privacy rights.
  • Article 14 (Prohibition of Discrimination) – If his mental health was a factor, this could be discriminatory under Article 14.
  1. Violations of EU Law (if EU countries were involved)
  2. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
  • Article 5 (Lawfulness, Fairness, Transparency) – Processing personal data (e.g., his photo) without a lawful basis (e.g., consent, legitimate interest) is illegal.
  • Article 6 (Lawful Basis for Processing) – If police shared his data to harass rather than for a legitimate policing purpose, this would be unlawful.
  • Article 9 (Special Categories of Data) – His mental health status is sensitive personal data, requiring explicit consent or a substantial public interest justification (which gaslighting does not meet).
  1. European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)
  • Same as under UK HRA 1998 (Articles 3, 8, 14).
  • Article 6 (Right to a Fair Trial) – If he tried to seek legal redress but was dismissed due to his mental health, this could violate his right to access justice.
  1. EU Charter of Fundamental Rights
  • Article 1 (Human Dignity) – Gaslighting violates human dignity.
  • Article 7 (Respect for Private Life) – Same as Article 8 ECHR.
  • Article 21 (Non-Discrimination) – If his mental health was a factor, this is discriminatory.
  1. Police & Criminal Justice Directives
  • EU Law Enforcement Directive (LED 2016/680) – Police must process personal data lawfully and fairly. Using it to harass a citizen violates this.
  • Victims’ Rights Directive (2012/29/EU) – If he was a victim of police misconduct, he has rights to protection and support, which were denied.
  1. Violations of International Law
  2. United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD)
  • Article 15 (Freedom from Torture or Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment) – Gaslighting a person with a mental illness could violate this.
  • Article 16 (Freedom from Exploitation, Violence and Abuse) – Police facilitating abuse by others breaches this.
  • Article 17 (Protecting the Integrity of the Person) – Psychological harm violates this.
  • Article 22 (Respect for Privacy) – Unlawful data sharing violates privacy.
  1. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
  • Article 7 (Freedom from Torture/Inhuman Treatment) – Same as ECHR Article 3.
  • Article 17 (Right to Privacy) – Same as ECHR Article 8.
  • Article 26 (Equality Before the Law) – Discrimination based on mental health violates this.
  1. Convention Against Torture (CAT)
  • If the gaslighting caused severe mental suffering, it could constitute torture or cruel treatment under Article 1 CAT.
  1. Would He Have Legal Recourse?

In theory, yes, but in practice, it would be extremely difficult due to:

  • Lack of Evidence – If police coordinated this informally (e.g., verbal instructions, untraceable communications), proving it would be hard.
  • Stigma Around Mental Health – Courts and psychiatrists might dismiss his claims as delusional.
  • Police Immunity – Some police actions are protected by qualified immunity (though not for malicious acts).
  • Jurisdictional Issues – If multiple countries were involved, extradition and cross-border legal action would be complex.

Possible Legal Avenues:

  1. Complaint to Independent Police Complaints Body(e.g., IOPC in the UK, SIAC in France, Bundespolizeipräsidium in Germany).
  2. Civil Lawsuit for Misfeasance in Public Office, Harassment, or Data Protection Breaches.
  3. Human Rights Claim(ECHR via ECtHR if domestic remedies fail).
  4. Complaint to Data Protection Authority(e.g., ICO in the UK, CNIL in France).
  5. UN Complaint(e.g., to the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities or UN Human Rights Committee).
  6. Conclusion: Yes, This Would Be Illegal

If police across 12 European countries systematically gaslighted a man with paranoid psychosis by:

  • Sharing his photo unlawfully (GDPR/UK DPA breach),
  • Instructing others to mock him (harassment, misfeasance in public office),
  • Exploiting his mental illness (disability discrimination, UNCRPD violations),
  • Denying him legal redress (ECHR Article 6 violation),

they would be breaking multiple laws at the national, EU, and international levels.

However, proving it would be nearly impossible without concrete evidence, and the legal system’s bias against mental health claims would make justice elusive. This scenario highlights systemic failures in police accountability, mental health discrimination, and human rights protections.

Jo Shiner Has Troll Arrested For ‘Stalking’

A few days ago I came across a headline revealing that a troll had recently been convicted of ‘stalking’ Sussex Police Chief Jo Shiner. I wonder what he could have done, I asked myself. Perhaps he had been going into shops where she lives showing security guards and staff a photograph of her, and encouraging them to mock, abuse, intimidate, gaslight, and threaten her, whilst all the time, making sure that she didn’t know what was going on, or whether she was simply suffering from a paranoid delusion? Perhaps he’d done this for nearly two decades, and also got together with some other trolls, including trolls in a dozen other European countries, and they had access to her Internet connection and could know when she had booked any travel and such, and then pointed her out to security guards and staff in shops and train stations and airports before she visited them, again with the same instructions to mock, abuse, intimidate, gaslight, and threaten her?

That would be awful beyond belief, and certainly warrant a life sentence for the depraved psychopathic sadistic troll, although clearly not as evil as doing the above to somebody who was already mentally ill to begin with and who could get no help – legal or psychiatric – because they would not be believed. Anybody even partly responsible for doing anything as unimaginably evil and depraved as that would certainly be facing life behind bars, and if they happened to be a public official – such as a police chief – then they would without doubt be facing multiple life sentences in what would assuredly be the biggest scandal in the history of the UK police. Such a police chief would (confirmed by ChatGPT) face life for (psychological) torture under the Criminal Justice Act of 1988, life under the offence of misconduct in public office, a lengthy prison term under the law on aggravated harassment, as well as likely to be sued into tomorrow under multiple serious breaches of the European Human Rights Act. ChatGPT actually likened such police behaviour to the tactics of the former East Germany’s notorious Stasi secret police agents, who would gaslight and commit ‘zersetzung‘ (psychological warfare) against individuals who threatened the Communist Party.

Oh no, but the troll did not do any of that. In fact, it appears (from the 2 or 3 articles I read), that he sent her some messages on Twitter alleging that she was corrupt, and created accounts under her name that did likewise. But in the increasingly Big Brother society of the UK in 2025, that was enough to have him convicted for stalking and committing offences under the malicious communications act.

Meanwhile, and absolutely unsuprisingly, this is what Jo’s depraved and psychopathic police officers have been getting up to recently under her command:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14728213/Moment-disabled-93-year-old-pepper-sprayed-Tasered-hit-baton-police-dying-three-weeks-later-threatened-care-home-staff-knife.html

Met Police Demons Tried To Access Sarah Everard’s Case Files

Seven Met police officers are facing gross misconduct charges after being caught trying to access files relating to the disappearance and murder of Sarah Everard, raped and murdered by Wayne Couzens – one of their colleagues.

Given that the typical Met Police officer is a depraved psychopath, and that several years ago two Met officers were imprisoned for sharing photos they illegally took of the bodies of two young women murdered in a London park (women who the two pigs referred to as ‘murdered birds’), with forty-two colleagues in a WhatsApp group, we can guess what kind of ‘files’ they were hoping to look at.

What Kind Of Sadists?

What kind of depraved sadists point a paranoid schizophrenic out to shops, restaurants, train stations, airports, cafes, museums etc etc, in over a dozen different countries, incite or advise the security guards and even the staff of these places to mock, abuse, intimidate him, and in particular to mock him for ‘not liking to be looked at’, while never allowing him to know whether it’s really happening, or just another paranoid delusion he is suffering from? What kind of bestial psychopathic perverts do this, not just for 15 days, not just for 15 weeks, not even ‘just’ 15 months, but for FIFTEEN YEARS? With likely no intention of EVER stopping it until he finally loses his mind completely, or is driven into suicide? What kind of criminal, out-of-control, depraved monsters do this despite psychological torture by a member of the police being treated under the law as seriously as murder, and carrying an automatic life-term tariff? What kind of inhuman devils directly involve thousands of members of the public in this? What kind of bent psychopathic gangsters intimidate the victim into preventing him from seeking evidence for himself and others that he is not insane, and that they really are doing this, by doubling down on their torture when he attempts to record these things happening on his smartphone? What kind of sadistic monsters do this knowing the victim can never get even the slightest help, legal or psychiatric, because they know he will never be believed? What kind of medieval savages encourage the police forces to do exactly the same in at least 14 other European countries (including the Ukraine), thereby not only criminalizing those police, but normalizing the illegal and extra-judicial use of torture by the police in those countries? What kind of demons even invade the victim’s most personal and tragic moment of his life – the death of his mother – by sharing that information with some of those very same security guards?

The answer is of course, the Met Police. The Met Police that produced Wayne Couzens, that produced David Carrick, whose members appear in the headlines almost every day, on rape charges, sharing the photographs of ‘murdered birds’ on WhatsApp so their colleagues can jack off to them, and similar depraved shit, and who have been widely and justly condemned for being ‘rotten to the core’. Who the f*** else could it be?

Is Psychological Torture Illegal In The UK?

Is psychological torture illegal in the UK? Perhaps the reason I’ve been so unable to get any help in nearly 15 years is because, well, psychological torture isn’t illegal. The 1984 United Nations Convention Against Torture (CAT), ratified by the UK and every European country, expressly and clearly prohibits psychological torture. But perhaps, although ratified, the prohibition against psychological torture simply hasn’t been written into British laws on torture?

Psychological Torture By A Public Official Is Illegal And Carries A Life Term

According to Justice.org.uk :

In addition to the established common law provisions, section 134 Criminal Justice Act 1988 makes it an offence for any public official to ‘intentionally inflict severe pain or suffering on another in the performance … of his official duties’. This provision was introduced to honour the UK’s commitments under the 1984 UN Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (the Torture Convention).

According to provision 1 of section 134 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 :

A public official or person acting in an official capacity, whatever his nationality, commits the offence of torture if in the United Kingdom or elsewhere he intentionally inflicts severe pain or suffering on another in the performance or purported performance of his official duties.

Provision 3 makes it clear that this includes psychological torture.

(3)It is immaterial whether the pain or suffering is physical or mental and whether it is caused by an act or an omission.

Provision 6 states that the punishment for a public official who engages in torture, is life in prison.

A person who commits the offence of torture shall be liable on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for life.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/33/section/134

For nearly 15 years the police in the UK have pointed me out, directly or indirectly, to hundreds of security guards. Not only security guards, but shop workers, bar staff, restaurant workers. They haven’t simply pointed me out to these hundreds or thousands of people with the message – ‘keep an eye on him’. They’ve advised, incited, or encouraged all those people to let me know that they are ‘watching me’, or rather, theatrically and sadistically that they are ‘not watching me’. For example, exaggeratedly looking up at the ceiling or past me when I walk into a store etc. And when I make complaints to the stores in question, this is always denied, often aggressively, or more often ignored (but my complaints are passed on and the next time I visit the store, the security guard/staff will be even more aggressive and abusive).

And presumably at their behest, their colleagues in 13 other European countries have done exactly the same thing. For nearly 15 years. And they are still doing it today, with no sign that they have any intention of ever stopping until I’ve lost my mind completely or am driven into suicide.

And they have done this in the knowledge that I’ve suffered from paranoid schizophrenia. Or more precisely, they’ve clearly done this because of the fact I’ve suffered from paranoid schizophrenia, and they know it will cause me extreme psychological distress and suffering.

What they have done – deliberately gaslighted me in 13 different countries for nearly 15 years – would be unambiguously psychological torture under any reasonable interpretation of provisions 1 and 3 of the 1988 Criminal Justice Act, if it had been done to a healthy person, let alone somebody such as myself, who has been previously diagnosed and hospitalized for paranoid schizophrenia.

The provision 1 of section 134 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 makes clear that the nationality or the location of the public official is irrelevant. The UK police should be attempting to have the public officials in those 13 different European countries extradited to the UK to stand trial for the torture inflicted upon my person. Instead, the public officials (i.e. police and others) in those dozen or more countries were actually acting under the encouragement of the UK police.

Note that ‘misfeasance in a public office’ is also a criminal offence carrying a life term.

https://www.lawtonslaw.co.uk/resources/misfeasance-in-public-office/

See also : https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/law-and-courts/civil-rights/human-rights/what-rights-are-protected-under-the-human-rights-act/your-right-not-to-be-tortured-or-treated-in-an-inhuman-way/

List Of Met Police Individuals Liable for Life Term Imprisonment

I’ll keep a list here of senior Met Police and others, liable for life term imprisonment under the Criminal Justice Act of 1988, if as is surely fair to assume, they must have known of, approved of, or directed in any way my psychological torture during the last 15 years. Note that they also face life imprisonment under the offence of ‘misconduct in public office’, and could also receive further sentencing under the offence of aggravated harassment.

Chief Commissioners Of The Met Police

There have been four Chief Commissioners before Mark Rowley was appointed, since my illegal torture began in earnest towards the end of 2008. Sir Ian Blair resigned on December 1st around the exact time it started, or shortly before or after it, and was replaced by Sir Paul Stephenson.

2009 – 2011 : Sir Paul Stephenson
2011 – 2017 : Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe
2017 – 2022 : Cressida Dick
2022 (acting) : Sir Stephen House

Met Police BCU Commanders

Met Police ‘Borough Commanders’ have enormous power. The current (2023) Borough Commander for West and Central London (including Hammersmith & Fulham AND Westminister) is Owain Richards. Despite his BCU (Borough Command Unit) covering such an area of London, Borough Commanders like him have a surprisingly low profile. In all the (rghtful) media outrage over Cressida Dick, and the (rightful) demands she be held accountable for the gross failings of the depraved Met Police, Borough Commanders such as Owain Richards or Helen Harper never get mentioned, even though their BCU also covers Charring Cross police station, the home of one of the most disgusting of recent scandals. For this reason, it’s not even easy to find out who past Borough Commanders have been.

(AW) Central West Command Unit June 2021 – Feb 2023 : Owain Richards
(AW) Central West Command Unit 2020? – June 2021? : Helen Harper (now in the suitably woke Met Police role of ‘Head of Profession, Crime Prevention, Inclusion and Engagement‘.

Regional UK Police Commanders

Hastings

Hastings and Rother district commander Chief Inspector Sarah Godley (2019,2020 – ?)